Submit a power-rich site for AI infrastructure.

Existing compute or mining sites with usable electrical and facility infrastructure, stranded or curtailed generation with a credible operating basis and site control, documented industrial or utility capacity, and development-stage sites with verifiable control and interconnection status. Submitting a site in one of these categories starts a qualification review. It does not mean the site is accepted.

The authorized owner or representative and the site-control basis, the country, state or province and approved location detail, the energy source and power configuration, currently available MW and expansion potential, the utility, behind-the-meter, islanded, or hybrid arrangement, interconnection status and voltage, uptime, curtailment and dispatch constraints, the commercial power basis and term, facility status and existing load, fiber and carrier availability, water and cooling constraints, permitting and environmental status, the target availability date, and the desired commercial structure. Everything you enter is treated as self-reported until it is verified.

No. A submission creates a private site opportunity and starts a qualification review. No match, introduction, or transaction is guaranteed, and no operator has evaluated a site at the point of submission. If a current requirement may align, SLYD presents the relevant evidence and a proposed next step for human review before anything is shared.

No. SLYD does not guarantee financing, offtake, capital availability, or a transaction, and does not represent that capital or offtake is waiting for a given site. Any financing or offtake outcome depends on the counterparties, the diligence, and the governing agreements for that specific transaction.

Precise coordinates, counterparties, commercial cost detail, interconnection records, permits, and title documents belong in the controlled diligence workflow, not in the public intake. Use the public form for the profile-level information above, and add sensitive records only through the approved workflow, subject to authorization and the applicable confidentiality terms.

Yes, where the project has verifiable site control, a documented interconnection status, defined milestones, and a realistic delivery path. Development-stage submissions are qualified on the same basis as operating sites, and the evidence supporting control and schedule carries more weight the earlier the project is.

The legal owner or a representative with authority to act for the site. SLYD checks who may represent the site as part of qualification and does not infer authority, site control, or title from a submission.

SLYD confirms authority and completeness, identifies missing evidence, and coordinates the appropriate technical and commercial review with the relevant parties. Timing depends on the site, the evidence supplied, and the parties involved, so no universal review or closing time is published. Sensitive information, counterparties, diligence, and transaction terms proceed only through the approved workflow and governing agreements.